Choosing Co-Founders

I get asked probably once a week about how to find and choose co-founders.  I wish the answers were easy.  Actually the “find” part is not that hard.  The “choose” part is very hard in my view.

On the “find” side, I think that many co-founders find each other by accident or through happenstance.  Meet-ups are great forums for this.  At Cornell, we encourage our business school students to walk across the street to the engineering quad and hang out (and visa versa).  A little networking goes a long way.

On the “choose” side, I am luckily able to take the easy route and refer you to a post that I just read (sent to me by Nasir Ali, who is one of the heads of StartFast, an accelerator holding its first class of teams this summer in Syracuse – exciting!).  Here is that post.  Good stuff, and now that it is part of IthacaVC I will have a ready answer when next asked the question!

Don’t Lose Alone

In the Spring Term (i.e., now), I teach a course at Johnson called Startup Learning Series.  “Hosting” would be a more appropriate term because the course consists of 10 lectures, all by guests.  No required reading, no problem sets.  Come to class and get 1 credit.  If you miss more than 2 classes you don’t get the credit.

Anyway, last night my guest was Nick Lantuh, the founder of NetWitness.  NetWitness is spooky software that plays Big Brother.  I will leave it at that because what the company actually does is irrelevant to this post.

Nick’s lecture was awesome.  My 90 students were literally enthralled.  One wrote me right after class and the email only said “That presentation was sick”.   I confirmed that sick meant awesome.

Nick talked about company building.  He talked about exits.  He talked about product.  He talked about the customer.  But mostly he talked about sales.  Nick hit some fundamental points:

1.  If your sales guys are not making the most money in the company (because of commissions), then you should change your comp structure.   Note that NetWitness was exploding in revenue and profits prior to its sale to EMC so commission incentives were very meaningful.

2.  Don’t be an ass.  Nick could not stress this enough.  Don’t be an ass to customers (i.e., don’t take advantage), don’t be an ass to employees, and listen to everyone, ESPECIALLY the customer.

3.  Don’t lose alone.  If a sales guy lost a sale alone, meaning that he did not huddle with the team to save the deal, he would usually be kicked out the door.  Sales is a company wide effort – use the company.

4.  But, the sales guys owns the account.  Do not touch a customer without getting clearance from the sales manager (NOT the VP of Sales, but the actual account manager).

5.  All that matters is products and sales.   Have the best product and focus on selling.  Nick’s strategic plans go out 3 months…..purely sales focused.  I know that many of you will take issue with this one, but it certainly has worked for Nick (6 companies, 6 exits).

6.  Build a culture so that employees will die for you.  Incentives…..whatever you can afford.  One time he bought an employee a Harley for a big thank you (again, easier to do when your company is swimming in cash and your VC backed board says “hell, yes”.)

There were a boatload of other great soundbites too.  Sales, Sales and Sales.

 

Startups Paying Bonuses…..an Oxymoron??

I am a huge believer is paying bonuses when a company can afford to pay them.  And there lies the issue.  How do you define “afford”.  I like to define it as having positive cash flow at year end to cover the payments.  Positive cash flow in this context = profit.

With that definition, here are some things that would not qualify:

  • “Hey, sweet, we just closed a $3mm Series A”
  • “We rock, we just signed an agreement with the largest distributor in the country!
  • “Sweet!!  We just got FDA approval for a new drug”
  • “Guess what – it is end of year holiday time!”

I hope you sensed a little bit of sarcasm in my text tone.  But yes, I have heard these and more.   Closing a Series A has nothing to do with profits; the investors want the $$ used to build a business.  Signing a large distributor has nothing to do with profits until you start selling lots of product (hopefully at a hefty profit) to the distributor.  Likewise for FDA approval – start selling the drug.  And holiday time, the biggest offender, has nothing to do with profits  and everything to do with emotion.

Motivating the team is obviously key.  Do bonuses motivate?  In general, it is hard to say that they don’t at least help to motivate.  So, at startups its is critical in my view for the CEO to set the tone from the beginning in terms of when bonuses can be paid.  If the team knows from the beginning that bonuses derive from profits that will serve to manage expectations well.  I think of the bonus mentality as an evolution that the CEO controls.

[just pushed “publish” instead of “save”…..sorry….here is the rest]

With respect to holiday time recognition the evolution might look something like this:  Year 1, holiday party.  Year 2, holiday party with $30 Starbucks gift cards.  Year 3, holiday party with $100 Apple Store gift cards.  Year 4, holiday party with $2000 cash bonuses (assuming profits exist to cover them).  Again, the expectation management is the critical component that must be managed from the top.

With all this said, I am 100% fine with paying a one-off bonus regardless of profits to a particular team member for an extraordinary effort.  For example, perhaps the head of bus dev did such an amazing job getting that big distributor signed up that the board decides to pay a “thank you” bonus to this person (despite the fact that the bus dev guy’s job is to get such big contracts signed up).

Look forward to your comments.

No Mess (Hanging Deferred Comp)

It is really easy to underpay yourself in a start up.  After all, there is typically not enough $$ to pay yourself well or at all.  It is easy to cut your salary during a cash flow crunch.  By using the word “easy”, I do not mean easy as in fun or simple.  Rather I mean easy as in you have no choice.  And having no choice is not too easy!

Prior to receiving outside funding, founders often work for very little salary.  Ideally, everyone is motivated by their equity stake and the hope of future reward.  A serious issue arises when the “salary not taken” shows up as deferred compensation on the company’s balance sheet or rears its head in discussions with potential funders.  This is not going to make for a pleasant talk.  It also makes for a messy balance sheet.  It is difficult or impossible to get deferred compensation paid once you have outside investors.  I think the most important point here is actually expectation management.

A similar situation arises when bonuses are granted even though they cannot be paid due to lack of cash.  Is employee moral boosted by paper bonuses that might get paid in the future if cash flow improves?  Doubtful.  I am guilty of falling into this trap as a board member.  The situation never ends well and, again, a messy balance sheet results.

I love to approve bonuses when cash flow exists to pay them (i.e., hey, we are selling product and making some profit).  I love paying market salary when cash flow exists to support.  I wish my VC fund were larger so that I could get paid more out of our management fee.   Reality is……it is not.  Reality is…..the payday hopefully comes later with exits.

Luckily, we don’t carry any deferred salaries on our books.