Horse Trading

“Horse trading” is a bad phrase in the startup/VC community.  It typically is used in the context of someone (often a VC) attempting to change deal terms between a signed term sheet and the closing of the investment.  The typical time between term sheet signing and closing is 45 – 60 days so there is ample room (unfortunately) to revisit issues.  I do not like horse trading and do not like it when others do it.  Yet I see it all the time.  I guess it is part of the VC investment game.  But it can be incredibly frustrating and not a good way to build trust.

So, what to do about it?  Short answer:  basically nothing – expect it a bit and take advantage to negotiate something in your favor.  Unless the term sheet deal is being turned upside down, horse trading typically falls into the nuisance category as opposed to the torture category.

VCs horse trade with each other too.  If a new investor is making, for example, a Series C round investment, that means there are likely Series A and Series B round VCs with whom to negotiate.  Many terms of the Series C round are going to have more of an impact on the Series A and Series B holders than on the management team.  So, prior to closing, the VCs themselves are negotiating just as much as management.   And there are all sorts of tensions that can build dependent on how aligned the Series A and Series B investors are with the existing management team, etc.

Here is an example.  Let’s say that the Series A liquidation preference (LP) is 1X and that the Series B LP is 1.5X.  The Series C investor negotiates a term sheet that provides for the Series C to be senior to the A and B and also for the Series C to have a 1X LP.  Term sheet gets signed and the parties are working towards the closing (lots of transaction docs keeping the lawyers busy, due diligence clean up, etc.).  As the document drafts are going back and forth, the Series C new investor says “I did not realize the Series B has a 1.5X LP; we need that too.”    A response might be “what do you mean you did not realize that?  You saw the Series B deal docs already……how did you miss that?”  Or, it might be “you are nuts to be bringing this up now.”  Or possibly, “I can understand where you are coming from, but why bring it up at this point.”  Or possibly, “Ok, I would ask for the same thing if I were you, but let’s lose that full ratchet anti-dilution protection…..”

Anyway, I am sure you get the point.  It is horse trading, and will inject a bit of agitation into any deal.  Get ready to deal with it…..unfortunately.  If you ever catch me doing it whack me over the head with a horseshoe.

100 Rules for Being an Entrepreneur

Ok, here is another repost.  James Altucher is also a Cornell alum (so part of the Ithaca family).   Here is Jame’s post from April 25th titled “100 Rules for Being an Entrepreneur”.  It is great and includes, yes, some pictures.

Enjoy:  http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2011/04/the-100-rules-for-being-an-entrepreneur/.

Short and Sweet – Tips for Getting into the VC Queue

When I come across another startup/VC blogger that I like, I like to share it.  Startup Professional Musings (see http://blog.startupprofessionals.com) falls into this category. It is written by Martin Zwilling.  He sticks to the short and sweet theme and has a very educational approach, which I think most readers probably appreciate.

His April 24th post (see http://blog.startupprofessionals.com/2011/04/startups-with-real-revenue-can-get.html) talks about getting into the VC queue.   My favorite line is: “Create an investment-grade business plan.”  It is my favorite because he then defines the business plan to be an executive summary, investor presentation and financial model.  Note what is absent – a written full business plan.  

I agree completely with this approach.  Note Zwilling’s click offs to each of the 3 parts as well.   The 3 parts completely cover what is in a full written plan.  The problem with a full plan is that many/most VCs have difficulty reading them due to lack of time.  The well voiced over presentation is worth its weight in gold.  And the financial model must be fully synced up to the presentation.  They both need to tell a consistent story (we all know things will change going forward).  

So, start telling!

3 Up / 3 Down

I was talking with one of the CEOs that we work with the other day about the “weekly update”.  See https://ithacavc.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/the-weekly-update/.  This post presents a variant to it.  Don’t get me wrong, I still love to get weekly updates and still love the purposes they serve.  The critical purpose on top of my mind this morning is “unity”, as in getting the entire team unified on an ongoing basis.  The team is not just the board, but the whole management team as well.  I encourage CEOs to send their weekly updates to their management teams (sometimes editing is necessary, but not often).  The “unity” purpose falls under “amazing communication tool” that I wrote about in my earlier post.

3 Up / 3 Down is a variant of the weekly update (perhaps call it the little sibling – not quite as mature as big brother or sister).  In total it might be 6 sentences (yes, even a recovering lawyer like me can do that math).  On Sunday night, as a way to start off the week with a unifying message to the team, I am suggesting that CEOs (or other person in charge of the update though typically it is the CEO) who have been unable to write a full one page update (and the best updates are not longer than one page IMO), simply write down the 3 things that make them feel up and the 3 things that make them feel down…….and then press “send”.   Obviously the points should relate to the business.  And my guess is that this should take between 5 and 10 minutes max.  Once sent, the board of directors will know what is on the CEO’s mind, the management team will know as well and the CEO will be building unity (among other things).

Now that I have suggested this, I am going to start doing it by sending my 3 Up/3 Down to my venture fund partners.

Interview Questions, Part II

This week is the Entrepreneurship@Cornell Celebration (April 14th and 15th).  See http://entrepreneurship.cornell.edu/activities/celebration/2011 for more information.  I am one of the primary planners for this event so my blogging time this week is running on empty.

Remember that I asked for your favorite interview questions on the April 6th Interview Questions post.  A few responses came in to augment the list. Here they are (verbatim):

1.   What is the most humbling job you’ve had?

2.   What is in refrigerator right now?

3.   If you could be an fruit, what would you be and why? (seems silly but you actually get fantastically interesting answers and explanations)

4.   Sell me this (pointing to anything in the room – a pencil, light fixture, etc.) – shows how the person thinks on their feet, how well they understand what’s in front of them (much less the actual product/service), and how well they can communicate the benefits to others.

I like the commentary on #3 and #4.  I am still trying to figure out #2!

In class the other night at Cornell, I had a guest lecturer in talking about priority management.  Two additional questions came out of that lecture, namely:

1.   Can I see your current task list?  I love this question.  I keep a running task list on a legal pad (one pad lasts about a year), so I have a real affinity for task lists that get used constantly.  It says a lot about the person and obviously their organizational skill set and compulsive tendencies.

2.  Can I look inside your purse?  Of course this only works if the applicant has a purse, but an organized purse is a sign of some obvious traits that can be really beneficial in the work place.  I was warned that this “purse” question might cause some HR problems…..

Have a great week.