Staff Leasing Companies

For small companies (say less than 50 employees), I am a big fan of using staff leasing companies to handle employee administration.  In a nut shell, the way it works is that the staff leasing company technically hires your employees and then leases them to your company.  Yes, you still make all the hiring, firing, title, salary, etc., decisions.   The staff leasing company is purely an administrative agent that brings economies of scale to your employee administration function.  To quote the website of one local staff leasing company in Syracuse (appropriately called Staff Leasing of Central New York):

“Staff Leasing helps your business by providing professional employer services designed to reduce your labor expenses. We become responsible for the administration, filing and compliance for your employees. This provides a support system for your current Human Resource Department, allowing you more time to focus on growth, selection, retention and employee development.”

Trinet is a much larger staff leasing company based on CA.   Same mission and purpose.  Just bigger.  There are many similar companies around the country.

So, allow your startup company to offer better benefit packages, including health care insurance, and also take all the burden of payroll administration and withholding off your shoulders.  HR outsourcing at its best.  Makes your life easier, and it typically won’t cost you any more either.  Good deal.

 

A Startup Knows It Needs a Lawyer When:

This is a follow on to my June 13, 2011 post about controlling your lawyer and was inspired by a comment to that earlier post.

Cost is the overriding issue for startups when it comes to properly engaging a lawyer.  My general retort on this point is this:  expect to incur real lawyer costs and get over it.  Of course, be judicious about the engagement, but a good business lawyer can be a huge asset.

Here are 5 clues that you need a good startup lawyer (and this is just 5 out of many):

1.   You are setting up a legal entity:  unless you are the only owner of the entity to be formed, then using an online legal service is pretty tricky and inefficient as there is no one to direct basic questions to like (i) how to deal with and document founder vesting, (ii) how many shares should I authorize and issue, (iii) what type of legal entity is best for me and my business based on a set of assumptions and (iv) what state should I form the entity in.   Setting up a legal entity that will have multiple owners from inception (like 2 or more founders) requires good lawyer input.  Lawyer time required (including vesting agreements for founders):  3 to 6 hours.

2.   You need (or think you need) a stock option plan:  granting stock options (and other forms of equity compensation to employees like restricted stock) should be done under a written equity incentive plan.  And each award to a given employee requires a separate grant agreement laying out the terms of the grant.  You need a lawyer to create the plan and grant agreements (on the grant agreements, once you have the form, you can probably use it for other future grants of the same type).   Lawyer time required:   3 to 6 hours.

3.   You are hiring employees:   hiring employees comes with a host of issues such as (i) non-compete agreements, (ii) ownership of invention agreements, (iii) employee tax withholding, (iv) employee safety policies (like no harassment and privacy, etc.), and (v)  how to properly fire employees.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.  Lawyer time required:  5 to 10 hours dependent on how fast you are hiring.

4.   You are raising money:   raising funds requires documentation regardless of type of financing.  You might be doing a convertible debt round or an equity round.  The convertible debt round will take less legal time.  Despite that the documentation is pretty standard, questions for your lawyer always come up.  If you are doing a convertible debt round, expect legal fees of between $3,000 to $10,000 depending on the number of investors and length of negotiation.  If you are doing an equity round (assuming preferred stock), assume legal fees of between $10,000 to $25,000 again dependent on number of investors and negotations.  Unfortunately, the fee amount is independent of the amount being raised.   One short cut that I can tolerate is if you are truly raising funds from family members that you trust, you can use a really simple promissory note for a convertible debt round or a really simple subscription agreement for an equity round (email me if you would like forms).

5.   You want to engage an outside board member:  an outside board member (as opposed to one that is also on the management team) should sign a board member agreement and also, assuming equity compensation, get a stock option agreement or restricted stock grant based on what has been negotiated.  A good lawyer will be able to help you with all these issues and even give meaningful input on how much equity the new director should get and appropriate vesting period.  Lawyer time required:   1 to 3 hours.

Now the good news is that once you get the initial dose of good legal input, the going forward legal time for similar issues will decrease.  But then again, hopefully your business will be growing, and, if it is, then your need for even more lawyer time will go up!

As a lawyer friend of mine once told me “I love spending time with you – the fact that it is billable is just icing on the cake.”   Start eating the cake.

Control Your Lawyer

Full disclosure – I used to practice corporate/startup law.  In fact, I did it for about 14 years prior to joining Cayuga Venture Fund.  I still slip in some for a portfolio company once in a while (easy stuff that won’t cause a conflict).  I liked practicing corporate law.  And I still like to do it occasionally.  I told a group of students once that writing a contract was like writing a book – all the sections were like chapters that had to make sense when read sequentially and the whole contract should tell the story of the business relationship.  Most of the students’ eyes glazed over…..

Some clients love to hate their lawyers.  Some clients love to blame their lawyers.  Some lawyers ask the client to use them as an excuse for the client taking a particular position.  Lawyers are expensive and hard for startups to afford.

Yet, critically, having a good lawyer for your business is a huge MUST.  Things happen all the time that need legal input and documentation.  Examples:  (i) hiring, (ii) firing, (iii) workplace harassment, (iv) raising investment capital, (v) borrowing money from a bank, (vi) entering into an agreement with another company, and (vii) creating a stock option plan.  The list goes on and on.

CVF uses the firm where I got most of my legal training (Ropes & Gray in Boston).  And they are very expensive.  We love $1000/hour phone calls; really some have cost that much because there were 2 lawyers on the phone.  Incredible.

But, this post is not about complaining about the cost of lawyers.  I don’t mind paying them assuming the work product is good.  Rather this post is going to touch on the need to control your lawyer and not let a deal go south because of bad lawyering.  Importantly, I am only writing about corporate lawyers – not litigators.  My advice for companies in need of a litigator is to find a lawyer that will cause the most discomfort to the party on the other side of the lawsuit.  Corporate lawyers, by contrast, are supposed to help parties get business relationships done.  I think of corporate lawyers as facilitators.

In my view, it is critical to find a corporate lawyer that knows a bit about business and understands the risks that businesses present.  Your lawyer should understand that it is not worth trying to legally “cover” all the risks as the only predictable result of that will be to so utterly piss off the other side that the deal might evaporate.  The lawyer needs to understand the business goals of his/her client and the goals of the other party to the transaction.  I have been in situations where the “large company” in house lawyer is so clueless about the goals of its own client (the executives from the same company) that the lawyer has put forward positions that would kill a deal.  All this does is waste energy and often money as the other party to the transaction has its own lawyer now wasting time bantering with the clueless inside counsel.

So, what to do?  The business people must make the business decisions.  Sure, the business people must take into account what the lawyer presents as risks.  But the business people should have the courage and authority to tell the lawyer to back down and draft up the agreed upon business transaction.  The business person needs to control the transaction and the lawyer should be raising issues for discussion.  Sometimes issues will arise that rightfully kill a deal.  More frequently issues arise for which a solution exists.  A lawyer that helps present good solutions is an amazing resource.

So get a lawyer that can see the forest through the trees.  If you want any recommendations just email me.

Ithaca – The Next Boulder, CO

A recent article on Cayuga Venture Fund in DowJones Venture Wire made its way into the WSJ Venture Capital Dispatch (sister publication).  It has been getting a decent amount of attention.  Here is the link.

Besides the content, which I like (!!), I want to do something out of the ordinary and give a bit of praise to the WSJ reporter Chris Zinsli.  Over the past 4 years, Chris has actually followed CVF with some interest and we have developed a great working relationship.  Reporters can be tricky to deal with sometimes – my suggestion is to approach them with a relationship building state of mind.  And think about it as a 2 way street as well.

90 plus degrees in Ithaca today…..enjoy the heat!